Which chatbot powered by generative AI will you be using? Although ChatGPT is without a doubt the most well-known AI chatbot to have ever been on our screens, it is not without rivals. One of these rivals, Claude, provides a powerful AI chatbot service, but does it surpass ChatGPT?
What Is Claude and ChatGPT?
The GPT LLM (long language model) and ChatGPT AI chatbot from OpenAI are probably already familiar to you. Although ChatGPT is advertised as a chatbot, a tone of effort has been done to transform it into a knowledge resource.
Over the years, many ChatGPT versions have been created; the two most well-known and current are GPT-3.5 and GPT-4.
In order to develop into a powerful and sophisticated AI-powered tool, Reinforcement Learning from Human input [RLHF] has been used to train ChatGPT together with knowledge and human input. 570GB of data (dating up to September 2021) from books, websites, news stories, journals, and other sources were supplied to ChatGPT throughout its training phase.
As a result, ChatGPT can handle human requests to give users information, advice, content, and even code. ChatGPT received almost 1.6 billion visitors in June 2023 alone, according to Similar Web.
Claude, on the other hand, is an LLM created by Anthropic. Like ChatGPT, Claude is made to understand spoken language naturally and answer in a helpful and kind way. Anthropic launched Claude 2, which is presently in beta, in July 2023.
This was introduced as Claude 1.3’s replacement and contains a number of enhanced capabilities, including a better capacity to produce code in response to user inputs. Additionally, Claude 2 features a bigger context window than its predecessor, allowing users to communicate with the chatbot by providing lengthier instructions and additional details.
For this comparison, Claude 1.3 and Claude 2 will be used.
It is possible to utilize ChatGPT’s two most recent versions, GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, albeit GPT-4 is only accessible through ChatGPT Plus. GPT-4 has a greater character input and output limit than GPT-3.5 and has a much larger number of options. Again, both versions of ChatGPT will be covered in this article.
A Quick Comparison between ChatGPT and Claude
We’ve given a straightforward comparison chart that you may use to grasp the fundamentals before going into further detail about ChatGPT and Claude’s advantages and disadvantages.
As you can see, there are a number of distinctions to take into account.
Pros and Cons of ChatGPT
What distinguishes ChatGPT from Claude? What benefits and features does it tout?
Pros of ChatGPT
Starting with its capacity to respond to prompts, ChatGPT gives its consumers several wonderful features and advantages.
As was previously mentioned, ChatGPT’s training process involved more than simply data feeding. Additionally taught to process human language, the GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 LLMs provide more skillful and conversational answers. ChatGPT has a human-like tone and can respond to a plethora of questions. Facts, grammar and spelling checks, schedule creation, text translation, and other services are all available through ChatGPT.
While GPT-3.5 is capable of doing all the aforementioned tasks, GPT-4 is even better at understanding human language, correctly responding to instructions, and successfully reasoning. The character limit in GPT-4 is double that of GPT-3.5.
Additionally, ChatGPT offers several browser plugins, such as:
- Zapier
- Wolfram
- OpenTable
- Alchemy
- Quickly Perfect
- Reading Links
- FiscalNote
- KAYAK
- DAIZY
Although these plugins have a variety of uses, they all let you include ChatGPT into your online activity.
Cons of ChatGPT
The fact that ChatGPT’s training data is limited to September 2021 is one of its main drawbacks. This restricts what you may ask for since ChatGPT is unable to give any more recent information.
Additionally, ChatGPT encounters AI hallucination, in which an AI system gives an incorrect response that is inconsistent with its training data.
No matter how far from reality this response veers, the system will accept it as true. AI hallucination may result in inaccurate knowledge and untruthful answers(AI chatbot ChatGPT).
You can use ChatGPT for nothing, but you’ll only be able to access GPT-3.5’s features. You must upgrade to ChatGPT Plus, which has a monthly fee of $20 as of this writing, in order to utilize GPT-4. This may be a difficult hurdle to overcome if you don’t want to invest any money but yet want ChatGPT to be the best it can be.
Last but not least, ChatGPT does not enable usage over a VPN, which might be problematic if you often use a VPN or wish to circumvent geo-restrictions in your country.
Lessons from Claude
How does Claude stack up against ChatGPT then?
Claude’s Benefits
We’ll discuss some of the areas in which Claude excels over ChatGPT in this section.
First off, Claude could be a better option for people who want to use an AI chatbot to write or improve code.
This is particularly true for individuals who are utilizing Claude 2, which has a far larger context window than Claude 1.3 (which had a token maximum of just 9,000) and ChatGPT. Users of Claude 2 may enter an astounding 100,000 tokens every query, giving the chatbot extra information to work with.
If you want a generative AI chabot to examine a huge block of code, ChatGPT (whether GPT-3.5 or GPT-4) will be less flexible than Claude 2 in this regard. With Claude 2, you don’t have to be concerned about exceeding the input limit while providing large amounts of code.
As a result, Claude 2’s enhanced output limit enables replies that are more detailed and instructive.
Furthermore, Claude was trained using data from December 2022, which is nearly two years later than ChatGPT. This increases Claude’s capacity to respond to fact-based queries by allowing it to use more recent data.
Last but not least, there are no one-time charges or ongoing monthly subscriptions necessary to utilize Claude 2.
Cons of Claude
The main restriction on Claude is his geographic accessibility. As of this writing, only citizens of the US and the UK may use Claude, although ChatGPT is accessible in the majority of the world’s nations.
Claude lacks plugins, which restricts its adaptability in some situations, unlike ChatGPT. If you need some assistance crafting your messages or summarizing the ones you get, you may add Claude to Slack.
It’s critical to keep in mind that Claude, like ChatGPT, has a chance of experiencing hallucinations.
Comparison between Claude and ChatGPT
Let’s give each of these two AI chatbots the similar instructions to observe how they respond in order to better understand how these two AI chatbots and their respective LLMs operate.
1. Possessing Creativity
First, we requested poems from Claude and ChatGPT using the same prompt each time.
Claude and ChatGPT both offered poetry that matched the requirements of the prompt.
The poem by ChatGPT was a little bit shorter, emphasizing that it adhered to the desired ABAB rhyme scheme.
Claude, on the other hand, offered a little longer poem, although both are roughly equal in terms of creativity.
2. Capabilities in Mathematics
Additionally, we requested Claude and ChatGPT to resolve a mathematical puzzle. The same trigonometry problem, including determining the value of an angle, was provided to both chatbots.
As opposed to merely giving us the solution, ChatGPT’s response walked us through the problem step-by-step.
Claude provided us the following solution to the identical issue:
It’s interesting that ChatGPT provided the right response while the other chatbots had various results.
3. Interpretation
Finally, we requested English translations of a Japanese paragraph from ChatGPT and Claude. The opening sentence is as follows:
Claude did a better job of translating from Japanese to English than the original text.
Claude and ChatGPT can become into bitter rivals.
Although ChatGPT is already virtually a household brand, rivals like Claude have a great chance of unseating it from the top rank. Who knows, Claude could someday surpass ChatGPT as the main rival!
See more: click here
